georgetownFaith_614x75.gif
Jacques Berlinerblau

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is associate Professor and Director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Many years ago he received a doctorate in ancient Near Eastern Languages and Literature from New York University. Soon after, for reasons that he himself has never fully understood, he completed another doctorate in theoretical sociology from the New School for Social Research. Feeling sufficiently credentialed to write about and research any topic under the sun, his areas of interest include the Bible, its composition, its interpretation, and in particular the way that it has been dragooned into modern political discourse. To this end his new book is called "Thumpin' It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today's Presidential Politics" (Westminster John Knox), described by First Things as "laugh-out-loud funny as well as astute." He also has published "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously" (Cambridge:2005). An earlier book, "Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals" (Rutgers: 1999) probed the manner in which institutions of higher education handle scholarly dissent. He has written extensively in scholarly journals on the subject of heretics, intellectuals, secularism, and Jewish civilization. This confluence of interests accounts, to a great degree, for his fascination with modern Jewish-American literature. A life-long New Yorker, he has recently moved to Washington D.C. with his family and is beguiled by the strange traffic lights that count down the seconds until they finally change colors. Close.

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is program director and associate professor of Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and author of "Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics." Full bio »

The God Vote | Georgetown/On Faith Archives | On Faith Archives | Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs | Georgetown


Rudy Giuliani: The Perfect Imperfect Catholic

None of our aspirants for High Office is anywhere near as operatic as the former Mayor of New York. Say what you will about him, but Giuliani is never boring.

» Back to full entry

Featured Comments

Jenna:

According to Professor Berlinerblau's assessment, Giuliani’s personal life will "fatally doom his candidacy among “values voters.” While Giuliani may not fit the "ideal" value voter's profile of the perfect candidate because of past issues with women, and his openness to the gay community, he candidacy amongst the Christian Right is surely not "doomed” because of the level of political intelligence amongst the value voters.

Giuliani's personal politics, as opposed to his personal life, seem to fit into some of the stringent requirements issued by the value voters in choosing a candidate to support. While his support of a woman's right to choose is a major hindrance to their support, he seems to hold other pieces to the puzzle. First, let's start with his strong support of Israel, which Prof. Berlinerblau draws attention to when he mentions that Giuliani kicked Arafat out of the Lincoln Center. This is a key issue for the Christian Right and is something that other candidates cannot claim as strongly as Giuliani. Second, Giluiani's outreach efforts to the value voters seem to be working. In a recent speech to Regent University, the college founded by televangelist Pat Robertson, Giuliani cited his strong support against "Islamic terrorism" and delineated twelve moral commitments to the American people. By focusing his words around terrorism, what he declares the "major issue" of the campaign, he evokes patriotism in order to make up for his abortion stance.

So while Giuliani may not be the perfect fit for the value voter's support, he is not as far off as some may believe, which helps to explain the recent Pew Forum poll. So rather than allowing their faces to twist into question marks, the political pundits should start to realize that the value voters may not be as strict in their requirements for candidacy as we believe, and that amongst a candidate pool that is a varied as the one today. They are not choosing the overtly religious Sam Brownback or Mike Huckabee with the same enthusiasm as Giuliani. I think the pundits need to recognize that the poll numbers that show an oddly large amount of support for Giuliani, despite his abortion and same-sex marriage stance, show the political savvy of the Christian Right in their search for a candidate who supports their values, but whom can actually win the general election.

Kelly:

While Americans may have earned themselves the reputation of siding with "boring" candidates when asked about values, I disagree with Berlinerblau's statement that this trend has made much of a difference in the presidential races. Maybe Giuliani has a colorful past, but it pales when compared to that of Mr Bush. How much do we really care?

Most people can easily state a laundry list of personal values, retrievable from religion, family upbringing, etc. Yet perhaps more often people vote for reasons more difficult to explain- something more nuanced than a black-and-white stance on "moral" issues (especially when there are more serious issues of global importance). I know I do. At the same time, voting is an even simpler matter for others: my Catholic grandfather, given the option of a Catholic candidate, would not even need a moment to decide, however blemished this candidate's background may appear.

Call him an "imperfect Catholic," but I find it difficult to believe that this country would welcome anything closer to a perfect one.

Beverly Williams:

Rudy appears to have problems maintaining marital relationships. That says a lot about him as a person. Is he trustworthy, truthful, patient, kind, empathic, insightful as to others concerns and needs? Is he overly aggressive and verbably abusive? Will he have patience in dealing with other world leaders and will he attempt to understand their cultures and internal pressures?
Is this a man who shows respect for the average American? Will he work well with Congress? Will he work for the American people or for Big Interests? Will he use common sense, rather than just follow the party line? Why is he being considered? Is it just because he is well known? Or is it because he is the very best America has to offer. Think America, think. I am just an ordinary American who loves her country.

Post a Comment

Please return to the All Comments page to join the discussion. The best comments will be featured on this page.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.
> > > > > > > > > >