Faithbook

"That Every Jewish Mother Will Know"

Speaking of the deal to exchange a live murder for the bodies of two murdered Israeli soldiers, the head of Israel's National Religious Party, Zevulun Orlev, said "The approval of the deal transmits an important message, that every Jewish mother will know that the State of Israel will never abandon its soldiers."

In America, we talk about politicians voting their conscience all of the time. Sometimes, our politicians call each other names about their religion. But I can't think of an example where the whole nation is as bound up in one religious-moral question the way Israel was bound up in this question: Is it right to return a murderer to freedom, who might kill again, -- Israel, like most of the free world, has no death penalty -- in exchange for the bodies of dead soldiers? What is better for morale? What is the right thing to do?

In the end, the government made the same awful, impossible, perhaps necessary decision that the public made long ago: The right thing to do is to secure the return of their sons' bodies. ("In addition to the bodies, Israel will receive a report on a missing Israeli airman whose plane crashed in Lebanon in 1986, and body parts of other Israeli soldiers.")

The Jewish month of Av begins at the end of July, and Jewish tradition teaches that "When Av enters, joy decreases." As a student, it's always hard to associate the levity of summer with the gravity of Judaism's saddest holy days. I don't mean to be one of these people who connects every sad incident in Jewish history to the same date, but this news story reminds me of how out-of-this-world other people's grief can seem. Just as Tisha B'Av tends to fall on a beautiful summer day, perfect for a doubleheader, so too a mother advocates freeing the murder of her children so that another mother can see the cadaver's of her own while I eat ice cream and ponder going to the beach. If religion isn't for times like this, what is it for? But what religion can explain to me what those mothers are going through?


By Michael Pomeranz  |  June 30, 2008; 9:55 PM ET  | Category:  Lox et Veritas
Share: Email a Friend | Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Interfaith? How about INTRAfaith? | Next: Zoom Out on the City

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Michael,

This is a very thoughtful essay, and you ask questions that are very difficult, if not impossible to answer. Perhaps, Norrie Hoyt is right:

"A Buddhist or a Christian would not have made this trade.

They would have realized that a dead body in itself, in the scheme of things in the universe, is of no consequence, while the release of a savage murderer is."

I don't know. But, then, we are neither Buddhists nor Christians. The issue, as you know, goes to Eretz Israel, which is where the bodies of the dead soldiers belonged. On the other hand, the fact that this savage murderer who bashed in the head of a nine-year-old girl, who murdered her father, and caused another child's death, is now free, does give one pause. The depth of this issue, the questions it raises are, from a Jewish perspective, endless.

And, here am I, a Persian Jew, exiled with three million other Middle Eastern Jews, some of whom have actually seen murder in the streets, of Jews.
Where was the rest of the world, while we, the oil-less were undergoing this torment.

Perhaps, next time a murderer of Jews is to be exchanged for Jewish murder victims, the murderer should be released to those nations who view the murderer's activities as, in some way, heroic. A number of countries come to mind.

Shalom,
Farnaz

Posted by: Farnaz | August 13, 2008 1:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Michael,

This is a very thoughtful essay, and you ask questions that are very difficult, if not impossible to answer. Perhaps, Norrie Hoyt is right:

"A Buddhist or a Christian would not have made this trade.

They would have realized that a dead body in itself, in the scheme of things in the universe, is of no consequence, while the release of a savage murderer is."

I don't know. But, then, we are neither Buddhists nor Christians. The issue, as you know, goes to Eretz Israel, which is where the bodies of the dead soldiers belonged. On the other hand, the fact that this savage murderer who bashed in the head of a nine-year-old girl, who murdered her father, and caused another child's death, is now free, does give one pause. The depth of this issue, the questions it raises are, from a Jewish perspective, endless.

And, here am I, a Persian Jew, exiled with three million other Middle Eastern Jews, some of whom have actually seen murder in the streets, of Jews.
Where was the rest of the world, while we, the oil-less were undergoing this torment.

Perhaps, next time a murderer of Jews is to be exchanged for Jewish murder victims, the murderer should be released to those nations who view the murderer's activities as, in some way, heroic. A number of countries come to mind.

Shalom,
Farnaz

Posted by: Farnaz | August 13, 2008 1:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A Buddhist or a Christian would not have made this trade.

They would have realized that a dead body in itself, in the scheme of things in the universe, is of no consequence, while the release of a savage murderer is.

Posted by: Norrie Hoyt | August 4, 2008 3:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

what is the right thing to do?

right of return of the palestinians would be a healthy start...

Posted by: VICTORIA | July 5, 2008 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I cannot understand this trade and I cannot understand the lack of response on this blog! The trade of two bodies is not for just any murderer. The trade will free Samir Kuntar. The LA Times reports:
"Samir Kuntar is Israel's longest-held Lebanese prisoner...

Israel has suffered many attacks over the years, but the one that killed the family of Smadar Haran and a police officer nearly 30 years ago was seared into the nation's collective memory, and the tragic results became a symbol."

And with good reason. Kuntar burst into the home of the Haran family. Witnesses said that after leading Danny Haran and his 4 year old daughter to the beach, Kuntar shot the father before smashing the child's head against a rock, kiling her as well. Haran's wife hid in a crawl space in the home and in desperation, frantically trying to keep her 2 year old girl from revealing their presence, the mother tragically smothered he own daughter.

As though all this is not horrible enough-- recovering the BODIES of two soldiers captured in their OWN COUNTRY BY invading terrorists, and releasing the most monsterous murderer that can be imagined, it is even worse!

Kuntar is a "celebrity" prisoner in Lebanon, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has set Kuntar's release as a goal.

In Lebanon civilians are killed when terrorist launch missiles from apartment buildings (of collaborators -no doubt). In Israel, babies are killed when they are pulled out of their homes.


Where is the outrage?

Posted by: ida | July 2, 2008 6:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is too heartbreaking to discuss, to read about or even to contemplate. The loss of a child is way too tragic to comprehend, the capture, probable torture and then ultimate death of a child is even worse, way worse. To add to this the extra pain of releasing the killer of someone else's child is beyond description. Even for the coldest bleakest day in winter.

Posted by: emma | July 1, 2008 5:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company