There He Was
Georgetown is the type of place where students debate politics at parties. While I’ve never heard the question asked “Is that beer produced and manufactured under environmentally sustainable and socially responsible conditions?” I wouldn’t put it past my fellow Hoyas. A smaller number of us, self-titled ‘religion dorks,’ were known to take on philosophers like William James over glasses of wine. An enthusiast of mind altering substances himself, I imagine James would have tipped his spiritual hat to our noble cause.
At one party last year, I spotted someone whom I had never met, but whose religious reputation preceded him. This robust young man was a former Georgetown student who joined the seminary and was well known in our social circle for his conservative religious and political beliefs. Since we had mutual friends, and I was feeling religiously confrontational, I made a high-heeled walk towards him.
At first, the future minister of God and I were polite, sharing cool recollections of our respective involvement in our church. But it didn’t take very long for us to reach an impasse. It was that troublesome “question of women.”
Over the course of our conversation, we had gained an audience, a bunch of intellectual groupies who watched us sling theological quandaries at one another like spectators at a tennis match. They cooed with each one of our passionate comebacks.
-Well what about the 12 apostles?
–Well, what about Mary Magdalene?
-Well what about tradition?
-Well what about Jesus’ new law to “Love one another?”
-Well what about the “mother church?”
-Well what about the use of metaphor?
Over salacious rap music, I shouted to him several times “Don’t limit God!” He lectured me about the Holy Spirit at work in the church. Kayne West blasted on.
As I left the party, I promised to send him an email with a list of books I hoped he would read. “Remember the ladies,” I implored. I felt like Abigail Adams in 1776, pleading to her husband John for the rights of women. He was the one with power; she was the one with a grievance.
In Matthew’s gospel, it is written that Jesus said:
“Where two or three are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst of them.”
Which, updated for modern college life, translates to something like “Thou shall drink beer and argue over the priesthood.” And there He was.
By
Elizabeth Tenety
|
September 4, 2007; 1:32 AM ET
| Category:
Campus Catholic
Share: Email a Friend |
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Pre-9/11 Nostalgia |
Next: Our Expanding God
Posted by: Mira | September 9, 2007 5:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Mars,
In vino veritas, and, as Seneca said, "Bibamus,
moriendum est".
Posted by: Norrie Hoyt | September 5, 2007 5:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Elizabeth,
You have my respect and good wishes. From a fellow female Hoya of a previous generation-- never give up on our church. She needs this dialogue. If we left the church, who would save her?
A mother's advice-- PLEASE be wary of the alcohol consumption at those GU parties. It can be brutal. Evil comes in many forms.
Posted by: Mars | September 5, 2007 12:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Dear Elizabeth,
When are you going to wake up and figure out that religions are male-dominated, hierarchical constructs of human beings and having nothing to do with GOD?????????????????????????????
You are not equal in the eyes of your church. Are you happy with that? Do you think your church is ever going to change? Do you think you are ever going to change?
Choice: You can be free or you can belong to the Catholic Church. Which is it going to be?
Posted by: rb | September 5, 2007 12:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Warpimps:
Interesting that you can label me (unsuccessfully)as a "liberal" (another overused, meaningless word anymore) and accuse me of "soft relativism" based on a one sentence remark, which you did not address in your response. What is a "good' Catholic? If I were to similarly read into your blanket statement about evangelicals and jews I could conclude that you labor under a burden of bias and prejudice that might not qualify you as a "good Catholic". I am not sure that would be a fair reading either.
Posted by: echomike23 | September 5, 2007 10:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Good move Liz,
A catholic with a curious mind is sometimes hard to find. I had many of these convos down at JMU with the friends and fellow KofC bros. The church does need to be kept in check, and it is refreshing to hear your view. It is odd how others feel that having faith makes one completely irreasonable or irrational.
Posted by: MKC | September 5, 2007 9:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Sorry, Elizabeth, but an honest reading of the Bible demonstrates that the FMOG (future minister of God) had theology on his side. How someone as seemingly as bright as you, and of your gender, can continue to be a believer, let alone Catholic, simply baffles me. Jesus did essentially nothing to improve the position of women, slaves, and other oppressed groups.
Of course, since Jesus began as a mythological figure -- see Earl Doherty's compelling arguments to support this view in "The Jesus Puzzle" -- it is hardly surprising that Jesus had the same prejudices as those (particularly Mark) who invented him. Jesus, being God, could have -- in a few words -- simply declared that women are the equal of men, and anyone who thinks or acts otherwise will spend eternity in Hell. He could have done the same for slavery. Instead, we get "Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ" (Ephesians 6:5) (with the mistranslation of "slaves" as "servants," of course). Because you are a theology student, Elizabeth, I doubt I have to dredge up all the passages in the New Testament that endorse slavery and the shabby treatment of women. (Forget the Old Testament. The offensive material on women and slaves is so vast one can hardly touch on it in a comment like this.)
Elizabeth said to FMOG, "Don’t limit God!" Given me a break. The God of the Bible is so limited that he was obviously created by humans with limited knowledge and reasoning skills. I'm not sure who's worse: FMOG for taking the Bible literally or Elizabeth for providing cover for those who take it literally.
Posted by: MetricSU | September 5, 2007 12:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Elizabeth,
Speaking of your becoming a Protestant, you seem to be enthusiastically following Martin Luther's admonition:
LOVE GOD AND DO AS YOU PLEASE!
Good advice for all. Keep on enjoying the beer and the talk.
Posted by: Norrie Hoyt | September 4, 2007 8:59 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Echomike23:
There are plenty of things to wonder about politically and sociall as a Catholic (the evangelical+jewish push for Iraq war and the cheerleading by the media be one).
However, there are certain truths/beliefs that do not change to suit the fashion and prevailing attitudes of the day.
But as a liberal, what do you know about other than soft relativism...
Posted by: warpimps | September 4, 2007 6:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment
And a 'good Catholic' would be just what exactly? One who never questioned or wondered about anything?
Posted by: echomike23 | September 4, 2007 5:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment
And a 'good Catholic' would be just what exactly? One who never questioned or wondered about anything?
Posted by: echomike23 | September 4, 2007 5:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
In fairness, your pro-life work is admirable indeed.
Posted by: Joshua Trevino | September 4, 2007 5:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Couldn't WaPo find a good Catholic to represent the faith?
And please, Elizabeth: don't use "conservative" when you mean "orthodox."
Posted by: Joshua Trevino | September 4, 2007 5:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
How did you get this blogspot again?
Oh, right...this is the Washington Post and you are a "repressed minority."
In any case, men and women have different roles to play in the Church (as male and female have distinct and equally important roles to play in the natural world).
This isn't the 60's...if you find certain 2000 year old traditions difficult to accept then become a Protestant.
Posted by: speed123 | September 4, 2007 3:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I'm not feeling the love, here; I'm feeling pride in the strength of one's unassailable rhetorical position.
Posted by: mulopwepaul | September 4, 2007 11:00 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.












When the last Catholic church finally closes its doors, do you think they'll get it then?
Consider going Protestant. We'd welcome you.