A Palestinian Journey, An American Story
Not long after the State Department revoked the Fulbright scholarships it had awarded to seven Palestinian students because they were not given permits to leave Gaza, I found myself sitting in Imam Yahya Hendi’s office at Georgetown University listening to his remarkably American story.
(At Secretary Rice’s insistence, the scholarships have been reinstated, but some of the students are still having trouble getting permission to leave).
An encounter with the Israeli Defense Forces in the West Bank town of Nablus when he was eight years old left Yahya with a mouth full of blood and curses.
His mother cleaned his wounds and then sharply rebuked him. “When you curse the Jews you curse yourself,” she said. “No son of mine will insult a Prophet or a people.”
That comment sent little Yahya to the Qur’an with questions about how Islam views other faiths. The answer, he discovered, was that his holy book viewed other religious communities with great reverence. (For more on this topic, read Dr. Umar Abd-Allah's excellent essay, One God, Many Names.)
Young Yahya went on to become one of the best students in the Palestinian territories. Instead of taking his exceptional grades into the business world or the field of medicine, he made it his life’s mission to build better understanding between different religions.
And like many people with an idealistic dream, he came to America to realize it.
Arriving first in Texas, he told his dream to anyone who would listen. One person he ran into happened to be a professor at Hartford Seminary, and though he thought it a little peculiar that a Muslim would want to study Christianity at a seminary, he agreed to set up some meetings between Yahya and the seminary administration.
“Greyhound had a $49.99 special fare to anywhere in the country,” Imam Hendi told me, his voice sounding wistful. “That’s about all the money I had. I spent three days on that bus with nothing but water to drink. But it was my dream to study other religions, and that was my best chance.”
Not only did he graduate from Hartford, Imam Hendi helped spark an important new movement in seminaries across the country: the idea of people from different faiths studying religion together. Today, Hartford has one of the best such programs in the country.
Imam Hendi continued his studies at Temple University, where he ultimately received a PhD. He was mentored by an Orthodox Jewish professor, learned to speak fluent Hebrew and did part of his graduate work on synagogues in Philadelphia.
As if he hadn’t broken enough barriers, in 1999 he applied for a job as an Imam at a Catholic university – Georgetown. It was the first position of its kind in America.
“What new ideas will you implement here?” he was asked in his interview.
“I want to teach a course on interfaith encounter with a Rabbi and a Priest,” Imam Hendi responded. It is now one of the most popular courses at Georgetown, and is spreading to universities around the country.
“Tell me about this picture,” I asked Imam Hendi, pointing to a shot of he and President Clinton laughing.
“That is at the first Eid dinner that President Clinton hosted at the White House,” Imam Hendi proudly told me. He was the one who had suggested the event to the President.
The rest of the wall was covered with pictures of Imam Hendi and other senior government officials. He has spoken at significant military events, explained Islam to tens of thousands of Americans, and explained America to countless people around the world - often as a part of State Department delegations.
Imam Hendi represents America at its best: a country that understands talent is found in all nationalities, faiths and ethnic groups, and provides opportunities for that talent to develop.
Let's make sure that many more have the opportunity to follow in his footsteps.
By
Eboo Patel
|
June 19, 2008; 12:23 AM ET
| Category:
The Faith Divide
Share: Email a Friend |
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Muslims and the Destiny of America |
Next: The Emerging Interfaith Youth Movement
Posted by: Alan | July 23, 2008 5:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I'm a hot black single girl, I feel lonely... What I really need is love, Feel free to chat with me on ---Mixed Mingle. c o m--- where i upload my photos and many black or white singles seeking love online.
Posted by: daisy | July 17, 2008 2:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Seems more and more singles want to find online friends to talk about relationship, love, marriage or others... I heard that the single club---- ++++ (((((( UKinterracialmatch . c o m))))) +++++ ---- is a wonderful place for all singles to have fun together...
Posted by: sally | July 3, 2008 6:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Mahfouz is correct - see here
Posted by: Anonymous | June 27, 2008 7:19 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Comment Submission Error
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
You are not allowed to post comments.
Return to the original entry
Posted by: From: Timothy Shrivers Blogg with LOVE | June 23, 2008 2:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment
dont you think 20,000 hours of taped conversations over 10 years would have turned something up farnaz?
his only crime is daring to support the palestinian people-
do you think that is a crime?
Posted by: VICTORIA | June 23, 2008 10:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Anon Writes:
Sami Al-Arian is in prison today because he is in contempt of court for refusing to testify in a terrorism case, not because of his guilty plea.
------------
According to Wikepedia, Al-Arian fears his life would be in danger is he testified.
Any number of other sources on the web and elsewhere report the same.
----------
A "greatful nation" thanks Al-Arian and his compadres for the financial support they gave the George Bush campaign and the campaigns of other Republicans.
No doubt an even bigger thank you to Al-Arian will be forthcoming from the people of Iraq.
Posted by: Farnaz | June 23, 2008 7:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Your anti-American Al-Arian supporter has fallen victim to a pure piece of propaganda. As a movie, "USA vs. Al-Arian" ranks up there with "Reefer Madness." What the movie does not say is that Al-Arian pleaded guilty to a charge of materially supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a violent terrorist group responsible for the deaths of a hundred innocent Israeli and several American civilians.
Sami Al-Arian is in prison today because he is in contempt of court for refusing to testify in a terrorism case, not because of his guilty plea. The key to his cell is in his own hands.
Posted by: Anonymous | June 22, 2008 8:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Stay away from the racists Apostate- be they Muslim scholars, Christian scholars or otherwise.
Parentheses are added to change the meaning.
Be wary of parentheses.
Posted by: Anonymous | June 21, 2008 2:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Deborah writes,
Great.
Now when Muslims stop killing Jews, it will all be fine.
--------
Will it be, Deborah? I am one of three million Middle Eastern Jews living in exile. The few remaining are desperate. I watched the Iranian Revolutionary Guard slaughter a family friend, Ismael, in the street.
Will they return the home they stole from me? From Jews in Egypt, in Syria, in Yemen, in Iran, in Iraq?
AS for Palistinian Muslims, will they somehow give back the remains of the boy whose body they destroyed and pasted to the walls of a cave?
Will they cure the burns all over the "burned boys" about whom the US knows nothing?
Will they stop driving out the Palestinian Christians who flee into Israel, which cannot feed its own right now?
Last week, a Pakistani MUslim colleague, was finally freed from a Talib tormentor, who was identified and imprisoned. We are sisters to one another, and each day I wake up knowing she isn't safe.
When will it be all right, Deborah?
Farnaz
Posted by: Farnaz | June 21, 2008 12:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Re: Fatiha or Opening chapter
This is how the Muslim scholars whose edicts I have read explained verse 7 of the Fatiha(Opening chapter).
"The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace (i.e. Muslims), those whose (portion) is not wrath(as Allah has toward the Jews), and who go not astray (as has the Christians)."
(Quran 1:7)
Posted by: Apostate | June 21, 2008 10:57 AM
Report Offensive Comment
1:1 In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
1:2 Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
1:3 Most Gracious, Most Merciful;
1:4 Master of the Day of Judgment.
1:5 Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek.
1:6 Show us the straight way;
1:7 The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those whose (portion) is not wrath, and who go not astray.
Posted by: Anonymous | June 21, 2008 8:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Eboo says of Hendi
“The answer, he discovered, was that his holy book (Quran) viewed other religious communities with great reverence.”
Is depicting the Jews as monkeys and pigs part of that reverence?
"We(Allah) said to them(Jews):
“Be ye apes
Despised and rejected)"
(Quran7:166)
"He (Allah) transferred (Jews) into apes and swine."
(Quran 5:63)
Young Hendi did not have to curse the Jews. A well written ready curse is embedded in his Muslim’s Fatiha(opening) prayer which is recited during every salat ( ritual prayer).
"Show us the straight way
The way of those on whom
Thou hast bestowed thy Grace (meaning Muslims)
Those whose (portion)
Is not wrath (meaning Jews)
And who got astray." (meaning Christians)
(Quran 1:6-7)
Posted by: Apostate | June 21, 2008 7:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment
JJJ says:
“Yes Moslems respect prophets because they all came from the same cause. But prophets won't like to see people who mention their name kill defenseless people and rape their lands!!!”
You should direct this admonishment to your prophet who slaughtered the Jews of Arabia, expropriated their lands and sold their women and children as slaves.
Posted by: Ibrahim Mahfouz | June 20, 2008 11:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
another palestinian american's story
Terror prosecutions
Sami Al-Arian’s Catch-22
Sami Al-Arian has two choices: either testify, face perjury charges, and spend perhaps 10 years in jail, or refuse to testify, be found in criminal contempt, and spend at least five years in jail. Not even the military brass of Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 could have come up with this.
By John Halliwell, June 17, 2008
Damned if he didn't
The case against Clevinger was open and shut. The only thing missing was something to charge him with.
- Joseph Heller, Catch-22
Having lived as an American expatriate in Cairo for almost five years, I am often asked the question, “How are Muslims treated in America?” My response is invariably, “The vast majority of Muslims in America are left in peace; however, there are a few individuals the American government ruthlessly persecutes.” When I say “a few individuals,” I have at the forefront of my mind a certain Palestinian-American Muslim intellectual by the name of Sami Al-Arian.
After a failed trial whose verdict was declared by Time Magazine to be “one of the Justice Department’s most embarrassing legal setbacks since 9/11,” the American government has been resorting to legal ruses and an outright manipulation of the judicial system to keep Al-Arian imprisoned indefinitely. Now, after five years of imprisonment under conditions condemned by Amnesty International as “gratuitously punitive”, Al-Arian could be sentenced any day to at least five more years, and very possibly much more than that.
Al-Arian’s case captures all of the absurd qualities of the Bush administration’s putative “war on terror”. Much like Yossarian, the protagonist of Joseph Heller’s telling anti-war novel Catch-22, Al-Arian has been caught at the mercy of powerful individuals whose farcical logic and self-defeating strategies would be highly comical as the substance of a novel, but which are only that much more terrifying in the real world.
Take, for example, the fact that while Mohamed Atta — the ringleader of the 9/11 hijackers — was taking flight lessons in the same state where Dr Al-Arian lived, the FBI ignored him and spent their energies on wiretapping Al-Arian and his whole family, even though they knew he was not connected to any terrorist activities. The fact that the FBI was following Al-Arian for political and not security reasons has been confirmed by former FBI counterterrorism chief Bob Blitzer, who told reporter John Sugg unambiguously that Al-Arian had broken “no federal laws”. Similarly, an anonymous FBI source in December 2005 told Time Magazine that when Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered Al-Arian’s arrest in early 2003, federal professionals assigned to the case were utterly perplexed. “We were in shock, but those were our marching orders,” one FBI supervisor who was involved in the case noted.
Or take, for instance, the fact that while the Justice Department was trying to have the book thrown at Al-Arian for his alleged support of terrorism, Bob O’Neill, one of the lead prosecutors, was co-owner of an Irish pub in Tampa that publicly raised money for the political wing of the terrorist Irish Republican Army.
Or consider that, while Ashcroft declared Al-Arian to be “the most dangerous financier of Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the Western Hemisphere,” the chief prosecutor in Al-Arian’s trial, US attorney Paul Perez, freely admitted that, “Mr Al-Arian was not directly linked to any of the violent acts that we showed during the trial.”
The government’s attorneys weren’t the only ones employing questionable logic. After the jury acquitted Al-Arian of the eight most serious charges and hung 10 to two in favour of acquittal for the rest, one of the two jurors who voted for conviction explained her reasoning: “For me, the absence of evidence didn’t mean there was no evidence. For me, it suggested a cover-up.” So if there’s evidence, he’s guilty as charged; if there isn’t any evidence, he’s still guilty. Catch-22 indeed.
The fact is that the government tried to hold Dr Al-Arian accountable for a terrorist website he never visited, but whose link was posted on another website visited by one of his co-defendants (try going back and reading that sentence at least two more times). The prosecution also entered into evidence a conversation one of Al-Arian’s co-defendants had had with him in a dream.
If all this were just literary fiction assigned to first-year English majors it would be an entertaining satire of contemporary American society. But it’s not; this is the grotesque nightmare Sami Al-Arian and his family have had to live through for the past five years. Just as Joseph Heller tried to convey, the logic of power can be farcical, short sighted and self-defeating, but it is also uncompromisingly ruthless and senseless in the way that it destroys men’s lives.
Unfortunately, unlike Heller’s protagonist who, after years of dreadful military service, eventually flees toward the horizon to escape his dismal lot, our Palestinian Yossarian’s plight did not end here. After the verdicts were pronounced, the government publicly threatened to retry the case — perfectly legal, but highly irregular given the overwhelming support of the jurors for acquittal. By contrast, around the time of Al-Arian’s trial, a jury hung six to six in a case where the founder of Hooters restaurant was charged with tax evasion; the government realised that it could not realistically convict him in a retrial and let the case go.
Privately, however, the government wanted to minimise the embarrassment of losing the suit it had hyped up as the domestic terror case of the century, so they made Al-Arian an offer he couldn’t refuse. The government would release him as soon as possible and have him deported; all he had to do was confess to three minor acts: first, hiring an attorney for his brother-in-law, Mazen Al-Najjar, during the latter’s deportation hearings in the late 1990s; second, filling out immigration forms for a resident Palestinian scholar from Britain; and third, not disclosing details of his colleague’s political associations to a local reporter. Since the government claims the three people in question were associated with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, it could twist the language and say that Al-Arian was pleading guilty to “conspiracy to make or receive contributions of funds, goods or services to or for the benefit of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.”
After the plea agreement was signed, the prosecution recommended to the judge that Al-Arian be given the minimum sentence possible. The judge, however, had different ideas. He proceeded to give Al-Arian the maximum sentence allowed, absurdly claiming that Al-Arian’s “only connection to widows and orphans is that [he] create[s] them,” despite the jury’s overwhelming conclusion to the contrary.
Sadly, even this was not the end. Going back to the plea agreement, the government initially wanted to include a cooperation-clause in the agreement, which is standard practice in the Middle District of Florida, and which would have required Al-Arian to testify at any other trial he might be subpoenaed to. His lawyers were adamant that this clause be removed and that their client not be required to cooperate with the government. Prosecutors backed down and removed the clause.
Al-Arian was scheduled to be released 7 April, but a federal judge blatantly ignored the plea bargain and summoned Al-Arian to testify before another grand jury in an unrelated case. The government has never denied the understanding of the plea bargain (indeed, some government attorneys unusually offered to testify about its negotiation in front of a judge in Florida, but the judge was not interested), arguing only that the absence of an explicit clause exempting Al-Arian from testifying means that he can be forced to testify. Dr Al-Arian’s lawyers point out that this is bogus since the government’s oral promises are just as binding as their written ones.
Why would Dr Al-Arian be afraid to testify? If he’s innocent, what’s there to hide?
This brings us to the last and most cruel Catch-22 of all. As Jonathan Turley, one of Al-Arian’s lawyers, points out, “If the government wants to charge your client with perjury, it is almost certain to be able to do so by asking enough questions over the course of the proceeding.”
And indeed, the government has already attempted to distort Al-Arian’s words to try to convict him of just that. In 2000, while testifying at an immigration hearing for his brother-in-law, a prosecutor asked Al-Arian if he “believed in the use of violence to free Islam”. Dr Al-Arian answered “No” to this absurd question. Three years later, one of the charges against Al-Arian in the 53-count indictment was an obstruction of justice count based on his response to that question (Al-Arian was subsequently acquitted of the charge). Additionally, given that Al-Arian was under 24-hour surveillance by the government for at least a decade prior to his arrest, it is entirely implausible that the government cannot produce whatever information they want from him by other means.
In other words, Dr Al-Arian has two choices: either testify, face perjury charges, and spend perhaps 10 years in jail, or refuse to testify, be found in criminal contempt, and spend at least five years in jail. Not even the deranged military brass of Joseph Heller’s bizarre dystopia could have come up with such a cruel catch.
Dr Al-Arian, who is diabetic, began a hunger strike on 3 March. For the first 17 days he refrained from both food and water; he continued the hunger strike for 57 consecutive days, losing more than 18 kilograms of weight. Despite requests from thousands of supporters to ensure that Dr Al-Arian be given adequate medical attention, the US government never provided it and indeed at times displayed criminal negligence.
On 20 March, Al-Arian was brought before the court and, on the counsel of his attorneys, refused to testify. Any day now, he could be brought before the judge and found in criminal contempt.
The trial of Sami Al-Arian made it clear that the government was really punishing him for supporting the Palestinian cause. As reporter John Sugg wrote, the “onslaught” against Al-Arian “has been an organised, concerted effort” stretching back more than 10 years to when Israel’s right wing was seeking to undermine the Oslo peace process. Al-Arian spoke out as “an emerging voice that differed with the only politically correct narrative on the Middle East”. In the name of peace and justice, Al-Arian “was vigorously trying to communicate with our government and its leaders,” and was successful, “making speeches to intelligence and military commanders” and “inviting the FBI and other officials to attend meetings of his groups. People were beginning to listen...” As Al-Arian soon found out, “No Arab voice could be tolerated.”
While the judge allowed the prosecution to put 21 Israeli witnesses on the stand to testify to the horrors of Palestinian suicide bombings (even though the chief prosecutor freely admitted that Al-Arian was not directly linked to these acts of violence, as cited above), he would not allow the defence to talk about the plight of the Palestinians in any way, shape or form, going so far as to prevent them from discussing UN Security Council Resolution 242 which addresses the Arab-Israeli conflict. The fact is that Al-Arian’s activism for Palestinian issues, which he promoted through peaceful, democratic means, was far more of a threat to hardliner pro-Israel zealots than any suicide-bomber ever could be. His real crime was his commitment to the American ideal of free speech.
Alas for Sami, he lives at a time when this sort of twisted logic reigns over our justice system. Alas for Sami, alas for us all.
The writer is a member of the Free Dr Sami Al-Arian Now! campaign.
Posted by: VICTORIA | June 20, 2008 9:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Deborah
Are you in Israel?
Posted by: jjj | June 20, 2008 4:07 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I heard that those who earned scholarships from the US in Central Asia faced persecution from its dictators after they graduated. Most of them were journalist!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | June 20, 2008 4:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Great.
Now when Muslims stop killing Jews, it will all be fine.
Posted by: Deborah | June 19, 2008 11:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
We all must love.
We all must be of one family.
We all must learn from one another.
We all must find ways to confront hate together.
Let our house be united with all of us working together
Posted by: John Johnsons | June 19, 2008 5:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment
wow what an unusual story
i didnt know it was mr hendi's story-
once i took my friend's little boy to see the sears tower and told him how it was the highest building in the world at one time, and it required a person to envision its bigness and then plan it and execute it-
we sat and thought of all the big things in the world and how they had to be thought of by some person first- and we thought of all the big dreams he might have in the future when he was big himself-
mr hendi dreamed big and got big results-
heres to large hearts and the dreams that come from them...
Posted by: VICTORIA | June 19, 2008 4:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Great, Doug. Now when Jews stop killing Palestinians for just being there...
Posted by: Garak | June 19, 2008 3:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"I am curious to know what method of execution the Pakistanis are using now against their “blasphemers”."
While plenty of Pakistanis know that blasphemy is a sure way of eliminating ones enemies. They still do nothing, even judges know this. There are many thousands who are so blood thirsty that once a person is accused of blasphemy his death is guarantied. If an unfortunate individual is accused of blasphemy AND released he must flee the country by any means possible. NOthing has changed since the "last" prophet Mohammeds days.
Posted by: Arif | June 19, 2008 2:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Thank you, Eboo, for bringing another peacemaker to the attention of the world. To all those who posted comments critical of Islam or Israel, I would ask if you do not understand that until more people adopt reciprocity and relationship, then you will continue to get what you already have: hatred, conflict, death, and destruction in the name of whatever religion, political philosophy, culture, or people you happen to subscribe to.
Imam Hendi and Eboo Patel understand that we have to respond on the basis of our human oneness first. It is not easy, especially when people so often nurture their resentments and grudges against those they believe are different or have done them wrong.
You cannot address the stringent blasphemy laws in Pakistan by attacking all Muslims. You must work WITH Muslims to change minds and hearts to a new way of thinking about these things. You cannot address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without first recognizing that both Palestinians and Israelis have common hopes and aspiration as well as common grievances against one another.
Muslims in America have to develop thick skins to dodge the barrage of ignorant antagonism thrown at them. Wouldn't it be better if they didn't have to, but could be welcomed to sit and consult about how to make things better.
Better to speak at a moderate pitch and thus risk the possibility of being heard, than to be in your face antagonistic and thus remove all possibility of obtaining a hearing.
Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008 2:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Doug
Re: Blasphemy Laws.
Blasphemy laws in Muslim societies have historically been a handy tool for rulers and ruled alike to take vengeance against their enemies. Any person can accuse anybody of cursing the Muslim prophet or desecrating the Quran. The accuser only has to come up with one other “witness” besides himself to convict the accused. In the case the accused is a non-Muslim , the accuser do not even need a witness besides himself. This is because the testimony of a non-Muslim is equivalent to half that of a Muslim in the Sharia laws. The penalty in Arab countries during the Ottoman Caliphate time was pouring molten lead in the mouth of the “guilty”. I am curious to know what method of execution the Pakistanis are using now against their “blasphemers”.
Posted by: Ibrahim Mahfouz | June 19, 2008 12:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Fine Mr. Patel...What about the Moslem World. How do you differentiate between Moslems of the US and the Moslem all over the world? Didn't prophet Mohammed Peace upon him said the Moslems are all like the human body if one part of it is hurt the rest will suffer in fever and sleeplessness.
Don't you feel that what you write about religions coming together and other stuff is something that is redundant and outdated?
Do you think that the country which is continuing to slaughter Moslems all over the world is a country that is willing to extend its hands to Moslems, all over the world, in peace?
Do you think the country that is continuing to attack the Moslem family from its roots is a country that looks for talents in the Moslem world? Can't you see what happened today in Palestine? The Israeli murderers reached cease fire agreements with Hamas and started destroying houses and burn farms in the West bank!
Yes Moslems respect prophets because they all came from the same cause. But prophets won't like to see people who mention their name kill defenseless people and rape their lands!!!
Posted by: jjj | June 19, 2008 12:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Great, Eboo
Now when are your co-religionists going to get rid of nonsense like this:
Pakistani sentenced to die for blasphemy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/18/AR2008061800632.html?hpid=sec-religion
Posted by: Doug | June 19, 2008 12:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.












This interesting..