Diana L. Eck

Diana L. Eck

Director, The Pluralism Project

"On Faith" panelist Diana L. Eck is Professor of Comparative Religion and Indian Studies at Harvard University and Director of The Pluralism Project . Her books about India include Banaras, City of Light and Darshan: Seeing the Divine Image in India (1982). Her book Encountering God: A Spiritual Journey from Bozeman to Banaras (1993) won the Grawemeyer Book Award in Religion. With colleagues in The Pluralism Project , she also studies the changing religious landscape of America and has published A New Religious America : How a 'Christian' Country has become the World's Most Religiously Diverse Nation (2001). Close.

Diana L. Eck

Director, The Pluralism Project

"On Faith" panelist Diana L. Eck is Professor of Comparative Religion and Indian Studies at Harvard University and Director of The Pluralism Project . Her books about India include Banaras, City of Light and Darshan: Seeing the Divine Image in India (1982). more »

Main Page | Diana L. Eck Archives | On Faith Archives


Morning Watch on the Ganges in Banaras

As dawn was breaking, I experienced that vast "morning watch" observed by thousands of Hindus every day, a combination of morning prayer and religious bathing along the riverfront for miles.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (8)

Brin:

Hello, nice site :)

Brin:

Hello, nice site :)

BGone:

Candide, only the lucky ones die and come back as jackasses. All jackasses do is eat and breed. They have a distinct bray that is prayers to come back as what they are the next time round.

Norrie Hoyt is a disillusioned optimists. Just guessing of course but s/he's now talking to self. Thanks for the lesson Norrie. Looks to me like Harvard has turned into a Bible college too. I see not. Thanks for restoring my "faith" in higher education.

candide:

India is the most religious country in the world. And also the most backward and diseased (except for a small area of technologically advanced westernized people in the bigger cities.) Washing in the Ganges River is so spiritual it is bound to kill you!

Norrie Hoyt:

I think it would be useful and nice if the Panelists would enter the fray, mix it up and participate in a dialogue with the commentators.

With that in mind I'm reposting a question I asked you a couple of weeks ago. I'd love to know your answer to this:

Norrie Hoyt:
Professor Eck,

I think I have some idea of Harvard's atmosphere - I went to one of its graduate schools. It is - or was - a home for the new criticism and deconstruction, I believe.

How would a Harvardian answer this?:

"Dog" is a three-letter word which refers to a sort of animal that I recognize. That sort of animal is the referent of the word "dog."

"God" is a three-letter word that refers to - what? "God" appears to have no referent. Nothing that I can recognize as such, anyway.

Please explain. Thanks.

Posted December 24, 2006 3:42 PM

Anonymous II:

How supremely idiotic! How did you ever become a Harvard perfesser!

Did it occur to you that the reason the line stretched for miles was that the people had no running water, indeed nowhere to "bathe" except in the river?

Some goofball priest told them that it was "in order" to begin the day with ablutions to "cleanse" themselves while praying to God. Even if there had been no goofball priest they would have gone to the river to wash up. Of course, as we have learned in modern American corporate life, Compliance Officers are needed to ensure that corporate employees and officers do what our "goofball priests" (the regulators) require. Superimposing religion on all this was simply a Compliance issue.

How little things change.

The statement that there is an "impulse" to begin the day with prayer reflects a dubious conclusion based on a condition, rather than a cause. If this is a statement that there is some "instinct" to start with prayer, then the author's own experience in Montana and at Appleton Chapel belie it. After all, if there were some "instinct" to begin the day with prayer at the time of morning ablutions, Professor, you'd be praying in the shower at home, not waiting for someone to "organize" a prayer meeting every morning. But then you are a perfesser of religion, so you have to put on a demonstration.

The arguments about school prayer involved the same sort of approach -- some need to have prayers to start the day. Heck, so go ahead and pray at home BEFORE you get to school.

The actual reason for morning prayer -- first of all people have been scared into perceiving that there is a need to do it at all -- is that it's when time is AVAILABLE because the rest of the day is going to be spent working.

Obviously, since many churches have evening services, indeed, mid-morning, afternoon, and even midnight services, it's all a matter of scheduling, not some ridiculous contrived notion that everyone has an urge in the morning.

OTOH, maybe I'm being too harsh -- the question is what was YOUR formative experience and you have dug deep to pick Banaras. I'll accept that although I do find it pretty comical that watching thousands of Indians washing up in the morning and yelling "Hey Ram" or "Jai Ganesh" is a "formative" religious experience.

Wow!!

BGone:

PS the pole through her gut was a condemnation to hell of the first type, the forever wound. Ancients expected objects in the near vicinity of the body to be duplicated along with the dead body on the nebal bridge.

BGone:

The rising sun is highly inspiring. What your "morning watch" did was repeat a ceremony begun by the person on who's life the fictional character Jesus is based, Amenophis IV. As advertised, she was a rebel, set out to change the law.

Prior to her the Egyptians looked west towards the setting sun to find their spirituality. The sun setting was equated to death and the sun rising to the rebirth in the next life. She believed she was fathered by the sun and therefore she would be reborn after her death right here on earth. Thus it would not be necessary to have any more Pharaohs. She would simply come back to life everytime she died right here in this world instead of coming back to life in the next world like everyone else.

The high priest tested that theory, impailed her and waited to see if she returned. He expected the pole to return with her should her theory prove to be true so he was just a little nervous. Did she come back to life for a short period of time? Got faith?

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.