David Saperstein

David Saperstein

Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

Rabbi David Saperstein is the Washington representative of Judaism's Reform Movement as Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a position he has held for 30 years. The "On Faith" panelist also co-chairs the Coalition to Preserve Religious Liberty, and serves on the boards of numerous national organizations including the NAACP and People For the American Way. In 1999, Saperstein was elected first chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom created by Congress. The Religious Action Center advocates for a broad range of social justice issues and provides extensive legislative and program materials for synagogues, federations and Jewish community relations councils nationwide. It also coordinates social action education programs that train nearly 3,000 Jewish adults, youth, rabbinic and lay leaders each year. Also an attorney, Saperstein teaches seminars in First Amendment Church-State Law and in Jewish Law at Georgetown University Law School. He co-authored Jewish Dimensions of Social Justice: Tough Moral Choices of Our Time (1998). Close.

David Saperstein

Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

Rabbi David Saperstein is the Washington representative of Judaism's Reform Movement as Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a position he has held for 30 years. The "On Faith" panelist also co-chairs the Coalition to Preserve Religious Liberty, and serves on the boards of numerous national organizations including the NAACP and People For the American Way. more »

Main Page | David Saperstein Archives | On Faith Archives


The Gandhis and Their Moral Blind Spot

Arun Gandhi’s statement this week on Jewish identity, the firestorm of controversy it evoked, and his inadequate apology, requires a response.

There is a magnificent sculpture of Mahatma Gandhi in a little park off Dupont Circle in Washington. It is inspiring, capturing the moral energy of this frail but towering figure of justice. It sits just a few yards from my desk and every time I look up, it reminds me of the moral underpinnings of the work I do — a source of optimism for the world of justice and peace that, together, we may yet achieve.

Yet it reminds me vividly as well of another part of my task. For one of the several moral blind spots that Mahatma Gandhi had concerning anti-Semitism, particularly in the context of Nazi depredation and use of violence to destroy the Jews.

Arun Gandhi’s participation in On Faith has carried many of his grandfather’s values forward with eloquence and moral courage, a task to which he has dedicated his life’s work. So it was with great pain, sorrow, and surprise that I read with his historically and morally problematic posting on Jewish identity, eerily evoking his grandfather’s moral blind spot. As I was beginning to conclude I needed to respond, his apology was printed. With relief I opened it up only to be sadly disappointed and moved to feel that I must, now, respond.

Three things are most deeply troubling about his postings. The first is his description of the Holocaust as “the result of the warped mind of an individual who was able to influence his followers into doing something dreadful.” Rather than the result of a single manipulative leader, the Holocaust was, in fact, rooted in the pseudo-scientific racialism that swept Europe for 100 years, which flourished in the fertile field of bigotry and dehumanization of the Jews that was a tragic manifestation of Christian anti-Semitism for two millennia. It mobilized the entire apparatus of the state with the cooperation of segments of many conquered countries to do something that had never been seen before in human history: employ the structures of an entire state and new technologies to eviscerate the presence of an entire people from the face of the Earth. Indeed, as Mr. Gandhi said in his apology, “suffering of the Jewish people, particularly in the Holocaust, was historic in its proportions.”

Second, except for a general admonition to the Jewish people to remember the lessons of the Holocaust (“to forgive but to never forget”) neither the original posting nor the apology conveyed a single lesson from the Holocaust for the subject he discusses: Israel’s use of force. In contrast, one lesson most Jews, and many non-Jews, learned is that there are limits to non-violence, that when confronting an evil that utilizes violence with no moral constraints, peaceful resistance may prove futile. Had it been practiced by the world during World War II, there would be no Jews today. This evokes Mahatma Gandhi’s blind spot on the same subject. In a famous public exchange with Judaism’s leading philosopher and advocate of non-violence, Martin Buber, Mahatma Gandhi wrote:

“If the Jews, instead of being helplessly & of necessity non-violent, adopt active non-violence, i.e. fellow-feeling for the gentile Germans deliberately, they cannot do any harm to the Germans & I am as certain as I am dictating these lines that the stoniest German heart will melt. Great as have been the Jewish contributions to the world's progress, this supreme act of their will be their greatest contribution and war will be a thing of the past."

He offered similar advice to the British in his writings.

Contrary to Arun Gandhi’s assertion that the refusal of the Jewish people, and all people of conscience, to forget the Holocaust has locked them into a mindset that validates Israel’s use of violence, it is the need to secure Israel’s security and safety against those who would destroy her that drives her use of force (whatever criticism or support we might offer to particular policies). Mr. Gandhi’s refusal to even reference the formal state of war that most Arab nations still maintain against Israel, the persistence of terrorist attacks against Israel (terrorism notable for its almost exclusive targeting of civilian and not military targets), the current Gaza-based missile attacks on civilian centers, and the virulence of rabid anti-Semitism emanating from fundamentalist Muslim circles – all these failures reflect the moral blindness of his grandfather regarding Jews and deprives his moral analysis of the power it might otherwise possess.

A final note regarding the relevance of the Holocaust to world affairs. It is precisely the failure to evoke the lessons of the Holocaust which led to the world’s failures to confront genocide in Cambodia and Rwanda. In contrast, it was precisely when the Holocaust has been evoked to mobilize the conscience of the world, that it led to international efforts (of varying success) to halt the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Darfur. It is not surprising that Jews have played a lead role in all three of those latter examples.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (217)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.