David Saperstein

David Saperstein

Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

Rabbi David Saperstein is the Washington representative of Judaism's Reform Movement as Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a position he has held for 30 years. The "On Faith" panelist also co-chairs the Coalition to Preserve Religious Liberty, and serves on the boards of numerous national organizations including the NAACP and People For the American Way. In 1999, Saperstein was elected first chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom created by Congress. The Religious Action Center advocates for a broad range of social justice issues and provides extensive legislative and program materials for synagogues, federations and Jewish community relations councils nationwide. It also coordinates social action education programs that train nearly 3,000 Jewish adults, youth, rabbinic and lay leaders each year. Also an attorney, Saperstein teaches seminars in First Amendment Church-State Law and in Jewish Law at Georgetown University Law School. He co-authored Jewish Dimensions of Social Justice: Tough Moral Choices of Our Time (1998). Close.

David Saperstein

Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

Rabbi David Saperstein is the Washington representative of Judaism's Reform Movement as Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a position he has held for 30 years. The "On Faith" panelist also co-chairs the Coalition to Preserve Religious Liberty, and serves on the boards of numerous national organizations including the NAACP and People For the American Way. more »

Main Page | David Saperstein Archives | On Faith Archives


Don't Confuse Public Square With Government Square

There is a distinction to be drawn between the cultural expressions of the American people and the formal role of government.

Our culture is resonant with Christian overtones, mixed with the presence of other religions -- exemplified at this season by the presence of Christmas, Chanukah and Kwanzaa symbols and activities in the public square. Even so, our formal government laws and institutions eschew the notion of this being a Christian nation.

With 80% of the American people self-described as Christians, there is no wonder that the tone of public life will often have a distinctly Christian cast, particularly around holiday periods.

Indeed, the pervasiveness of religious aesthetics in America gives lie to the assertion of what Richard John Neuhaus has described as “the naked public square” as a justification to tear down the wall separating church and state. Such assertions confuse the government square (a comparatively narrow place in American life where religious endorsement and establishment is banned) with the public square (where from my perspective, religion is not just alive and well but flourishes with a remarkable vibrancy).

Indeed, the notion that there is a war on Christianity, a war on Christmas, or an effort to sanitize all mention of religion in public is simple bewildering and belied by what I see and hear every day: our bookshelves, music stores, radios, televisions, corporate America (including stores and businesses abounding with Christmas displays and carols), religious music and books, televangelists on TV, Christian music throughout our airwaves, fundamentalist voices on talk shows -- above all, in the over 300,000 houses of worship, where religious worship and teaching are widely proclaimed.

It is only the government that must remain neutral on religion, for the government square is, appropriately, different. This is a government of all the people, by all the people, and for all the people. The vision of our founders asserted that the protection of religion and integrity of government required that government be separated from any law or action even respecting an establishment of religious life. President George Washington and the Senate of 1797 that included many of our Founders could not have been clearer than in the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Bey and Subjects of Tripolis of Barbary, when it observed that “…the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

In today’s America, it was Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor who summed up this idea most simply and compellingly in asserting a constitutional ban against government endorsement of religion. She argued that no one should be made to feel like an outsider because of the actions of their own government. In this sense, America is not – nor should it be – a Christian nation.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (7)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.