Chester L. Gillis

Chester Gillis

Amaturo Chair of Catholic Studies at Georgetown University.

"On Faith" panelist Chester Gillis is the Amaturo Chair of Catholic Studies at Georgetown University where he has served on the faculty since 1988. He was chair of the Department of Theology from 2001 to 2005. He holds degrees in philosophy and religious studies from the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium and earned his Ph.D. at the University of Chicago. His research interests include comparative religion and contemporary Roman Catholicism. He is the author of "A Question of Final Belief: John Hick’s Pluralistic Theory of Salvation" (1989), "Pluralism: A New Paradigm for Theology" (1993), "Roman Catholicism in America" (1999), "Catholic Faith in America" (2003) and editor of "The Political Papacy" (2006). He is co-editor of the Columbia University series Religion and Politics. He is a Fellow in the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown, and is the Director of Georgetown’s Program on the Church and Interreligious Dialogue. Close.

Chester Gillis

Amaturo Chair of Catholic Studies at Georgetown University.

"On Faith" panelist Chester Gillis is the Amaturo Chair of Catholic Studies at Georgetown University where he has served on the faculty since 1988. He was chair of the Department of Theology from 2001 to 2005. more »

Main Page | Chester Gillis Archives | On Faith Archives


Will the Pope Really Listen or Just Talk?

The Question: What can Pope Benedict XVI say and do to repair the growing rifts between the Vatican, the clergy and the laity in America?

I hope and believe that Pope Benedict will acknowledge and express contrition for the church’s moral failings regarding the sexual abuse tragedy in the American church—a tragedy that has scarred victims, damaged the reputation of the priesthood, and cast doubt on the hierarchy’s leadership. Recognition of the gravity of the scandal and sincere contrition, at a minimum, are an important step towards repairing the damage done, knowing that for victims no acknowledgement or apology will fully restore their lives.

The language of “rifts” between the Vatican, clergy, and laity suggests perhaps more than mere differences or misunderstandings. And, indeed, there are multiple interpretations of these relationships. Some in the American church are quite content with the present status of the relationship between Rome and America. They believe that it preserves the universality of the church, underscores the authority of the papal office, and places the proper emphasis on the tradition. They are enthusiastic about Benedict’s papacy and have little patience for a pluralism of views in the American church. Other Catholics hardly know Benedict’s or the church’s views on a range of issues and they don’t seem to care much about the church’s teachings, whether articulated by the pope, the bishops, or the parish priest. They are indifferent to the teachings and the pleadings of the church.

There are many, however, who respect the office of the papacy and identify with the church, but disagree with a variety of official teachings, ranging from the church’s prohibition of birth control to its understanding of homosexuality. This is the audience that will watch with a skeptical eye but hope for some sign of openness to change. There are many things that Benedict could say to this segment of the American church, such as expressing a willingness to revisit some of the current positions with the possibility for change. He could decide to initiate a dialogue with American Catholics (and others) in which concerns about women in the church, sexual ethics, interreligious relations, and other issues are topics to be explored. He could invite bishops and laity to come together to the Vatican for unscripted dialogue about issues of governance, authority, and regulation. He could listen to those who hold that culture may influence religion and how it does so.

However, neither is he under any requirement to do so, nor, judging by history, is he likely to do so. The talks, and thus the script, for this trip are already written. Most likely, he will reiterate the church’s teachings and encourage Catholics to follow them. At the same time, however, I think that he will try to inspire them to live the gospel, in season and out of season. He will recommend that the gospel transcends political differences within the church. How this balm will soothe the wounds in the American church remains to be seen.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (11)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.