Charles "Chuck" Colson

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson

Founder, Prison Fellowship ministry

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson is founder of Prison Fellowship, a Christian outreach ministry to the prison population of this country, as well as to ex-prisoners and crime victims. The "On Faith" panelist's daily radio commentary, BreakPoint, is aired daily on over a 1,000 radio outlets nationwide. Colson also is a syndicated columnist, lawyer, and author of 25 books, most recently The Faith (2008). He served as special counsel to the late President Richard M. Nixon (1969-73). After pleading guilty to a Watergate-related charge of obstruction of justice in 1974, Colson served seven months of a one to three-year federal prison sentence. His 1973 Christian conversion was documented in the internationally best-selling book and film, Born Again. He founded Prison Fellowship in 1976. In 1993, Colson was awarded the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion and donated the $1 million prize to Prison Fellowship. In the last 28 years, Colson has visited more than 600 prisons in 40 countries and, with the help of nearly 50,000 volunteers, has built Prison Fellowship into the world's largest prison outreach, serving the spiritual and practical needs of prisoners in 93 countries including the U.S. Close.

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson

Founder, Prison Fellowship ministry

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson is founder of Prison Fellowship, a Christian outreach ministry to the prison population of this country, as well as to ex-prisoners and crime victims. The "On Faith" panelist's daily radio commentary, BreakPoint, is aired daily on over a 1,000 radio outlets nationwide. more »

Main Page | Charles W. "Chuck" Colson Archives | On Faith Archives


Extreme in Love, Not Violence

If you believe there is anything in the teaching of your religion that promotes the death of innocents, you should flee from that.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (14)

hello world:

hello world
hello world http://helloworld.com hello world
[url=http://helloworld.com ]hello world[/url]

hello world:

hello world
hello world http://helloworld.com hello world
[url=http://helloworld.com ]hello world[/url]

cheap viagra:

Hi! I'm John Strass and i like your site!
cheap viagra
Thank you!

cheap viagra:

Hi! I'm John Strass and i like your site!
cheap viagra
Thank you!

Daniel:

Let us not forget that more people have died in Christ's name than any other figure in human history.

Yes, you can not fault the people of the present for the actions of others in the past, but you can fault the religious doctrine that drove the people of the past to commit those crimes against humanity.

DuckPhup:

This conundrum CAN be resolved... quickly... easily... economically... once and for all.

My simple solution requres only that for one whole month, every newspaper in the free world devote its front page to cartoons ridiculing Allah (peace on him) and Mohammed (peace on him, too). By the end of that time, all of Islam will have self-destructed in a paroxysm of snits, hissy-fits and terminal apoplexy. WARNING: This will not be pretty... but the world will be a much better place for it.

My only regret in this is that I cannot think of a similarly uncomplicated, cost-effective and efficient stratagem to dismantle Christianity... but, oh well... one thing at a time. One only does what one can.

Nivedita:

"Christians ought to be extreme, that is, committed to the fullest in loving God and spreading His love abroad."

As long as its the love and not coerced conversions, I'm all for it!

JSH:

TJ:
Ok, I don't believe the Bible is inerrant. And I have no need for a mechanism to separate the wheat from the chaff. I know a lot of Christians that do believe the Bible is inerrant. And I can't think of one of them that's violent or a lunatic. A lot of them spend their time volunteering at local homeless shelters, working with kids, etc.. Sure, some are posers, but hey, we're human. So from my perspective, the stereotype doesn't ring true. Honestly, what do you think you'd find if you walked into a church this Sunday?

TJ:

JSH writes: "What rings hollow are the endless attacks on religion based on things that were done in the past in the name of god. Every people group can have extremists. If I choose to commit a crime in the name of America does that illegitimate America? No. Stereotyping a group based on the actions of a few is meaningless. If you want a realistic view of who Christians are, visit a local church this weekend and tell me how many violent lunatics you meet there. (unless of course, you're too content with your current perspective)"

So god didn't instruct Israelites to slaughter innocent infants or the bible isn't inerrantly true? If it isn't inerrantly true, then please describe the mechanism by which you separate wheat from chaff.

Bryson Hughes:

Brother Colson
The existance of our own faith owes to some violent extremism. I think we are taking too narrow a view to paint the picture as simple and rosy as to deny the extremism of figures who fought and killed in God's name all over the Bible. And we are conditioned in our thinking to just read over those passages without raising an eyebrow, assuming thse giants of our faith were right and God sanctioned. So correct and proper we think, when we read that Elijah had 400 religious rival slaughtered.

Maybe Brother, if we can see this glossing of such events in our own mind, to sense our own religious desensitization to otherwise revolting acts of violence, then maybe we can understand the mindset of religious extremist.

As long as our faith in God is intact, we cannot and will not see the actions of our heroes like Sampson and David as anything but warriors for God. But if our faith were destroyed, then like the atheist we would see our heroes as attrocious madmen killing for God.

We won't convince these religious extremist they are less than champions for God by compalining about their evil deeds. They want us to complain about them! That's the point! Make us hurt!

When we destroy their faith, an act which is easy by comparison, then they will realize what fools they are on their own.

I know American sensibilities are to tolerate religious beliefs. I need this tolerance, you need it. But to destroy the faith of the religious extremist will be the primary tool for convincing them they are wrong. In other words, we are refuting "false gods". Breaking faith means pointing out to those adherants, how miserably those idols have failed them, cannot provide for or help them, cannot save them from all the catastrophies that come upon them, or alleviate their suffering. Yes we attack their faith with ruthless and cruel facts, and do so at every turn and opportunity. This is what to say to religious extremeist. We mock them and say, look how your God fails you and how you and your people suffer. But we are blessed by our God!

Showing the contrast to our adversaries was a tactic used on the old Soviet Union. We had Disneyland while they had nothing. We let them know it often. It destroyed that nations faith in its ideology. We literally stole their souls. We can and should take the stand, to affront the faith of the religious extremeist, rather than be upset about the mere expressions of it. Attack the roots, to kill the fruits.

Prophet Bryson Hughes

JSH:

To TJ: What rings hollow are the endless attacks on religion based on things that were done in the past in the name of god. Every people group can have extremists. If I choose to commit a crime in the name of America does that illegitimate America? No. Stereotyping a group based on the actions of a few is meaningless. If you want a realistic view of who Christians are, visit a local church this weekend and tell me how many violent lunatics you meet there. (unless of course, you're too content with your current perspective)

RealityCheck:

God created man
Man chose his own way, including fighting his own battles
This created war
Since man chose his own way, God lets man do it his own way...for now.
Man created slavery. Man wanted divorce. God told man you cant keep a slave forever. You must give them freedom eventually. Did man follow Gods guidelines? No, not every time. So what else is new?
God chose to involve himself when and where he pleases, for his purpose (remember, ...man chose his own path).
Kind of like a father trying to teach a child that wants to learn the hard way. "OK you can do it your way...but..."
Even to this day, man blames God for what man has wrought upon himself.
Many ask.."Where is God...why doesnt he intervene, stop killing, etc?"
Because man chose his own way.
And so the circle goes.

john:

Eternal God our Heavenly Father, who has created this vast world and yet watches over the lonely sparrow, humbly I pray that You will be with our nation's pilots protecting and guiding those who leave the bonds of earth to fly high into the sunlit sky or into the stormy night. May our wings guard the United States of America and be a safeguard for all those who travel the airways of the world on their peaceful mission. May we continue to worship You and live in love and brotherhood.

Amen.

TJ:

Our panelist writes: "Extremism which leads to violence is contrary to the very nature of the God whom we worship. He and the tradition which has arisen from His teachings countenance violence only as in the Just War tradition when it is in protection of innocent life, a proportionate response to evil; or when it is necessary to enforce the law and to administer justice."

Did the Midianite babies constitute a threat worthy of the treatment that they received at the hands of your god's helpers? Was it a proportionate response? Was it necessary in order to enforce the law or administer justice? Or was it just infanticide committed by a bunch of violent lunatics whose actions were later justified with the supposed instruction of your god? "Hey, we wouldn't have done that unless god instructed us to". I don't suppose the 9/11 perpetrators would have did what they did unless god told them to do it either. Imagine that.

While I'd like to agree with the gist of your message, it rings pitifully hollow. Messages of peace and love from your god, and from followers of that god, are hopelessly hypocritical and without any merit whatsoever. Simply put, I don't trust your god because talk is talk and the proof is in the pudding.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.