Charles "Chuck" Colson

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson

Founder, Prison Fellowship ministry

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson is founder of Prison Fellowship, a Christian outreach ministry to the prison population of this country, as well as to ex-prisoners and crime victims. The "On Faith" panelist's daily radio commentary, BreakPoint, is aired daily on over a 1,000 radio outlets nationwide. Colson also is a syndicated columnist, lawyer, and author of 25 books, most recently The Faith (2008). He served as special counsel to the late President Richard M. Nixon (1969-73). After pleading guilty to a Watergate-related charge of obstruction of justice in 1974, Colson served seven months of a one to three-year federal prison sentence. His 1973 Christian conversion was documented in the internationally best-selling book and film, Born Again. He founded Prison Fellowship in 1976. In 1993, Colson was awarded the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion and donated the $1 million prize to Prison Fellowship. In the last 28 years, Colson has visited more than 600 prisons in 40 countries and, with the help of nearly 50,000 volunteers, has built Prison Fellowship into the world's largest prison outreach, serving the spiritual and practical needs of prisoners in 93 countries including the U.S. Close.

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson

Founder, Prison Fellowship ministry

Charles W. "Chuck" Colson is founder of Prison Fellowship, a Christian outreach ministry to the prison population of this country, as well as to ex-prisoners and crime victims. The "On Faith" panelist's daily radio commentary, BreakPoint, is aired daily on over a 1,000 radio outlets nationwide. more »

Main Page | Charles W. "Chuck" Colson Archives | On Faith Archives


| Next Post »

US Withdrawal Morally Unacceptable Until Iraq Stable

There was a legitimate question at the time American troops were committed to Iraq, whether our action conformed to the Augustinian “Just War” tradition with its various criteria: just cause, proper authority, right intention, last resort, and the like. I felt the just war standards were met by the threat presented.

There were precedents as well for a preemptive attack; as Sir Thomas More put it, “if any foreign prince takes up arms and prepares to invade their land, they immediately attack him in full force outside their own borders.” The subsequent discovery of our intelligence failures would have thrown this judgment into question. At best, it was a close call.

But the just war criteria do not apply to the current situation. For better or for worse, we made the commitment. We made promises and representations to the Iraqi people; we announced policies to the entire Middle East area; and now the question isn’t whether it is right to go to war, it is whether it is morally acceptable to leave.

To do so, in my judgment, would break the promises we have made to the Iraqi people, would lead to massive chaos and bloodshed, and would be an act of moral dishonor, no different in kind to what the Allies indeed did after World War II, giving vast territory in Eastern Europe to the Soviets, in the process returning as many as a million Russian refugees who had fled Stalin back into the grip of that dictator. Stalin proceeded to massacre most of them. That was one of the most shameful chapters in the history of the West—an abandonment of our most fundamental moral convictions.

As we consider the Christian perspective on our present dilemma, we are compelled to weigh heavily the fate of Israel. Christians have a great respect for the people of the old covenant, and are constantly reminded of God’s words to the Jews in His covenant with Abraham, “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse.” (Genesis 12:3).

No decision can be made about Iraq without considering what would happen to Israel; and this question does not appear to be in much doubt. President Ahmadinejad of Iran, a Holocaust denier, has announced an apocalyptic scenario and said that Israel must be wiped off the map. Iran is very close to a nuclear capability. If America withdrew now from the Middle East, I think it’s only a matter of time before Israel was destroyed. Iran, being Shiite, would doubtless take over the predominantly Shiite country of Iraq and would become the major power in the Middle East, despite all of the vain protests by the United Nations.

American policy-makers must also consider the serious consequences for American security. Al Qaeda, which now controls a portion of Iraq, which is active in Somalia, which is still located in Afghanistan, would be greatly emboldened by our withdrawal. There is no just war debate here, it seems to me, since Al Qaeda declared war on the United States—officially in the 1990s—and was responsible for the death of 3,000 American innocents. As we weigh our moral responsibilities and actions in accordance with the just war tradition, we need to remember that St. Thomas Aquinas put the just war doctrine under the heading of “Love” in his great Summa Theologicae. He did that because being willing to defend innocent civilians is an act of Christian charity.

So would our withdrawal make innocent civilians better off; or would it lead to the deaths of many innocent people? I do not believe, by the just war formulation, that America could in conscience withdraw from a war, rightly or wrongly started, until there is some political stability.


Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (93)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.