Catholic America

Action on Abuse Too Late but Not Too Little

Pope Benedict XVI’s first message to Catholic America on his historic 2008 visit came early – on the airplane, in fact. The pontiff said he was ashamed of the abuse of children by Catholic clergy. He promised to do everything possible to see that such things do not happen again. There is likely to be a heated debate between those who believe this statement satisfied papal obligations to move beyond the scandal for the good of the Church and those who think it was superficial and self-serving.

I don’t anticipate any quick resolution of the matter, and still less a smoothing over of raw emotions. Before reengaging in the debate, however, a few items need to be recognized.

• The Bishops have abandoned the principle, “Innocent until proven guilty” in favor of “Guilty until proven innocent” in order to address the offenses.

• Protection by a statute of limitations has been thrown out in order to clean house, punishing any offender at any time in the past.

• The church paid $2 billion in reparations, driving many dioceses into bankruptcy.

• The old practice of considering pedophilia a “sin” has been rejected in favor a more modern interpretation as a non-remediable sickness, requiring expulsion or exclusion from the priesthood.

These measures are stricter than norms used in the US Congress or many school districts, just to cite the better known institutions in America that suffer from pedophiles. Moreover, if the statistics are to be believed, Catholic priests have a lower incidence of sexual misbehavior than the clergy of American Protestantism and Judaism.

My observations are not intended to excuse the behavior of the individual clergy and much less of bishops who hid the scandals, but just to make the point that some radical and drastic changes have been made. They may be “too late” but I don’t think they can be called “too little.”

The issue that concerns me most is the Pope’s admission, “It is difficult for me to understand how it was possible that priests betray in this way their mission ... to these children.” I take him at his word that pedophiles will be excluded from the Catholic priesthood, but I am concerned that neither he nor other church officials have the savvy to discern prospective problem priests.

Those who dedicate their lives to the church and work in the rarefied atmosphere of Vatican and Chancery offices may be very sincere, but are they naïve about clergy sinfulness à la America? The saying, “The Devil is in the details” applies here. Lofty desires to do good and avoid evil need to be translated into practical norms for everyday administration.

Ironically, the laity most antagonistic to the hierarchy on this issue may be the best allies in establishing bullet-proof scrutiny for the future.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Comments (11)

Roy:

OK, Anthony, where is "Father" Aguilar? Where did he go after Mahony transferred him to Rivera? Why is he still practicing Mass in the Mexican State of Puebla?

Concerned The Christian Now Liberated:

Worth repeating:
The Crises (pl) in the contemporary Catholic Church:

1. The inappropriate conduct of many priests, the emotional stress on the victims and the resultant billion dollars in lawsuits.

2. The lack of talent in the priesthood.

3. The lack of Vatican response to the historic Jesus movement.

4. The Church's continuing cling to original sin and the resulting subsets of crazy ideas like limbo.

5. The denial of priesthood to women.

6. The restriction of priesthood to single men (unless you are former Episcopalian priests).

7. And the continued chain of Vatican "leadership" by old European white men.

Viejita del oeste:

Okay let's see if this one disappears....

The problem arose in response to two things: poor screening of seminary candidates, and abuse of clerical authority. The classes and meetings that I have attended as a volunteer in Catholic education place great emphasis on how to discern and report unacceptable behavior among other lay staff and volunteers. Finding anyone to listen to a complaint or suspicion about a member of the clergy or avowed religious community is still a problem just because of the top down structure of the organization. I have to say, in my archdiocese they really seem to be trying to address this.

Jean:

Part of the problem is the ongoing discussion of child abuse by priests in the US. The problem is world wide. It was and is no secret in my native country.

Medieval European literature is replete with references. It continues in the US today as does the refusal of priests to listen to acknowledge complaints about lay youth leaders and others.

The entire business is and always has been dispicable.

Maureen:

When my brother graduated from medical school, he told me they could opt out of taking a formal class that was required on recognizing child abuse in medical practice and instead take some form of a home study course, or something like that. This was years ago. It sounded like a homework assignment, and then take a test. I told him he wasn't getting a pass from me. There's too much at stake.

Viejita del oeste:

Gee, I guess my comment last night was too controversial....I wrote about the child protection classes that volunteers take...Maybe my concerns were less pertinent than the conquistador gold.

Paganplace:

The obvious, if painful solution, is for the Pope and Catholic scholars to *learn about abuse.* How it happens, its entire millieu, its traps, its effects, how Christian theology can *feed into this,* instead of looking for theological reasons for 'how can this evil happen...' They're still looking to purge a 'sexual sin' with nothing but more *control,* (Not that some isn't needed in a hierarchical authoritarian system, but it's just clearly not enough.)

Abuse is about *control,* itself. The sexual kind just involves *sex,* and doesn't occur in a vacuum, or among a laundry list of 'sins' that collectively need 'fighting.' How much of the Church's fixation on things sexual was *taught* by people who joined the clergy to 'struggle with their sins' in the first place?

Paganplace:

"The issue that concerns me most is the Pope’s admission, “It is difficult for me to understand how it was possible that priests betray in this way their mission ... to these children.”"

Much of the problem, Professor, is how naive that very mission *is* about sex and sexuality. Abuse of many kinds tends to come in its own generational cycles and contexts and rationales... frankly, trying to deal with the problem in the same way as caused it is pretty doomed to failure.

I'm pretty sure the Pope sees this issue in terms of keeping people obedient Catholics and otherwise keeping the flock in line. But this is one of the longstanding attitudes that nurtured the abuse to begin with. I know it's his job to say 'Jesus' a lot, but really, starting with apologies as humans instead of treating it as some 'trial of faith' for someone else, imposed by some people standing up and speaking out, might be a good first step.

Carney:

A welcome dose of sanity and perspective on this issue about the strict, even extreme measures that have been taken recently under the intense pressure of media hysteria and trial lawyer hounding.

As far as naivete, priests, like cops, are perhaps more familiar than anyone else with human failings and the dark side of human nature.

I chalk it up to relaxed standards of recruitment, a 60s non-judgmental culture, and bad advice from psychiatrists who claimed that various priests were "cured".

Anonymous:

washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2008/04/benedicts_fear_of_feminism.html

BGone:

Nows your chance to mention the Conquistador gold to the pope. We know he wouldn't hesitate to return it but you gotta ask.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.