If the leaders of our government are inspired by their faith, that is great. But, that is their business, not ours. And, we need to stop contributing to a political environment that suggests that we want our leaders to base public policy decisions on religious doctrine. The boundaries between religion and politics are already too blurred. Take a look at a video that our organization released last week. Imposing religious litmus tests on electoral candidates makes no contribution to democracy, faith, or freedom.

Candidates have been asked about their favorite Bible verse, their “greatest sin,” whether they would have to answer to their maker for supporting reproductive rights, and if they believe in every word of the Bible. Candidates have also used religious outreach coordinators, “faith clubs,” TV ads extolling their “Christian leadership,” and brochures titled “Committed Christian.” Former governor Mike Huckabee issued calls to rewrite the Constitution according to “God's standards” even though Sen. John McCain had already declared America to be a “Christian Nation,” thus unilaterally rewriting the Constitution and overriding the Founders’ clear intent.

Enough!

Personal faith plays an important role in public life through the influence of individuals. Fine. However, faith is not a credential that any candidate must claim to merit a vote in a public election. As a matter of fact, people concerned about the United States should be aware that the United States Constitution prohibits thrusting religious tests on candidates for public office.

As for Jesus and the United States presidency, I think he would take a pass knowing that his broad-based advocacy work requires a change in people’s hearts as well as their politics and that government is not, and should not be, capable of success in that endeavor. Distinction and separation between the ministries of religion and the institutions of government best serve the purposes of Jesus now as well as centuries ago.