If there are growing numbers in the military who list "pagan" as a religion, then it would seem appropriate for the military to have chaplains available to minister to their members. While such a step will challenge the structure that defines "chaplain" I see no harm if there is a demonstrated need. That begs the question, "What is a pagan?"
As for voting for a "pagan" for public office, again that begs the question, "What is a pagan?"
Some who read this blog will bring images of godless hedonists who worship nothing or, worse, come close to worshipping satan.
Others will associate pagans with atheists and put them in whatever box that will marginalize such "non-believers" relegating them to the outer darkness of contemporary society.
We must not forget that the founding fathers and mothers of this country were very sensitive to religion. They wanted to make sure the government was never dominated by one religion or another. And there are those who read the fruit of their profoundly important work as stating that not only should we have freedom OF religion but that we should also have freedom FROM religion.
When I am faced with choosing a candidate for public office there are many criteria I use. At the top of my list is a candidate's demonstrated ability to serve the common good. Strength of character, commitment to justice, protection of the planet and leadership to eliminate poverty, racism, and sexism, are all attributes I look for in a candidate for public office.
The religion or belief system of a candidate becomes relevant as a criterion for public office only if the candidate has a record of trying to impose that belief system on others.
Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.
Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
