The simply stated question actually poses deeply complex issues, from defining American Jewish identity to predicting what it will evolve into in the future.
Currently, it makes more sense to speak of American Jewish identities, in the plural, because those who can in one way or another call themselves Jews or who identify as Jews have not been a homogenous group in a very long time. Any definition that attempts to embrace the entire American Jewish community is bound to be either incorrect in major aspects or so overbroad as to be meaningless.
If pressed to suggest an all-encompassing definition of a modern American Jewish identity, I would be able to offer only a rather un-illuminating one: that American Jews of today are the descendants of people who 100 or 200 years ago had a very distinct, well-defined Jewish identity.
The future of Jewish Americans will not be determined by their status as a minority, but rather by this very question, how they define themselves. A minority that defines itself as being just like everyone else in the surrounding culture, with but a slight difference, probably has little current value and surely even less hope for a future. The more American Jews become identified with the prevailing culture, even with an affinity toward Israel, the sooner they can expect the same future as so many other immigrant communities who assimilated into mainstream America and lost their unique identity.
Change per se is not a threat to American Jewish identity, or to any minority religion. The real question is not what can a minority religion do to retain its roots, but whether there exists some sufficiently important, truthful, core that is confronting change. How “minor” is the essence of that minority?
Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.
Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook


