Why do so many American politicians -- from Bill Clinton to Mark Sanford -- use religious language when they make public confessions of marital infidelity? Are they truly penitent or just pandering? How can we tell the difference?
Posted by
Sally Quinn and Jon Meacham on June 30, 2009 12:09 AM
The public knows the difference between penitence and pandering by the aftermath: when real, repentance in words is followed by behavioral improvement. In old biblical English, "Repent, and do works meet for repentance."
Posted by Willis E. Elliott, on July 2, 2009 10:33 PM
Governor Sanford is no King David, and the people of South Carolina -- as well as the watching world -- now observe the sad spectacle of a man who, while admitting to wrongdoing, shows no genuine repentance. He should resign.
Posted by R. Albert Mohler Jr., on July 2, 2009 2:04 PM
I would suspect that Gov. Sanford and all of us who have "fallen" will be forever grateful that the theology of forgiveness provides some balm, some comfort, when we feel the most alone.
When Southern politicians use religious language to confess their marital infidelity, they are tapping into one of the Bible Belt's best known stories--the story of David and Bathsheba.
The politcians who gave those statements are all professing Christians, so it is not surprising that they used religious language. It would be surprising if they hadn't.
Posted by Charles "Chuck" Colson, on June 30, 2009 2:19 PM
There are many things that one can reasonably call Mark Sanford. Whether he is pandering or penitent we can't know. But what's clear is he has a certain facility with the "language of Zion," as its called, and that's a quality he shares with many of his Southern brethren and sister-en.
Posted by Gustav Niebuhr, on June 30, 2009 1:38 PM
The idea that a man of Clinton's intelligence could believe in a sky fairy or imaginary friend is absurd. Like other intelligent politicians, he presumably felt obliged to feign religious belief in order to curry favor with voters.
Posted by Richard Dawkins, on June 30, 2009 10:53 AM
No one can fully understand the heart of another person, nor the sincerity of his (or her) repentance. But many politicians use and misuse religion and religious language like a lifeline which they grab only when drowning.
Since the Bible celebrates both of those values, perhaps it is we who should invoke the Bible even more than the politicians when it comes to matters of public misdeeds and the proper response to them.
Posted by Brad Hirschfield, on June 29, 2009 9:35 PM
The religious language used by the political penitent is actually a form of the sin of pride: 'I'm really a fine Christian because I am religiously penitent."
Posted by Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, on June 29, 2009 7:26 PM
One of Governor Sanford's press conference apologies was "to people of faith across South Carolina, or for that matter, across the nation,..." Implicit in his apology, and insulting to nontheists, is that people of faith are expected to be more moral than people without faith.
Posted by Herb Silverman, on June 29, 2009 7:14 PM
I think it's perfectly obviously that saying you've let down God, your wife and family, and the voters (not always in that order) is part of the ritual of public apology for any politician who is caught committing adultery.